|
| #81  02-08-2010, 11:05 PM | ||||
| ||||
 Let's be honest...people aren't driven towards this sort of fame and this manner of success without huge gobs of ego... Since when was ego ever your most trusted advisor? It ain't... So you have to be some kind of VSP to handle the dichotomy of normalcy and fame. How many "stars" live up? Very few... VSP= very special person VIP=very important person One smacks of ego and is, not coincidentally, the overused title in celebrity-ville. Jennifer __________________ It doesn’t matter how many people don’t get it. What matters is how many people do. If you have a strong informed opinion, don’t keep it to yourself. Try and help people and make the world a better place. If you strive to do anything remotely interesting, just expect a small percentage of the population to always find a way to take it personally. F*ck ‘em. There are no statues erected to critics. ~ Tim Ferriss  |
| #82 02-09-2010, 12:52 PM | ||||
| ||||
| Started well, then kind of drifted away from what I asked, since what I asked was more about, uhh, "super-achieving users of (e.g.) visualisation" rather than "celebrities". I mean, Katia Ivanova (forex) is a "celebrity" but not outstandingly good at anything AFAIK. No harm done tho', I'll just restate. Maybe some success techniques are ... dangerous in a a double-edged sword way. What do other others think? (as the owner might say  ) __________________ . "Success: the favourable or prosperous termination of attempts or endeavours." Last edited by bomb #21; 02-09-2010 at 12:59 PM. |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
